Sonuç- Hediyemiz Var- Ekim, 2014

1

Son bir kaç gündür yoğunluğum nedeni ile çekilişi açıklamam ancak bu saati  buldu:(

Yorumlarınıza en baştan bu yana numara vererek , çekiliş yapan sitelerin birini kullanarak tamamen rastgele bir sonuçla belirledim..

image

image

Şanslı kişi 🙂

 image
Sümeyra Hanıma iyi günlerde kullanmasını diliyorum..

Sitemizin iletişim bölümünden bana adres ve telefon bilgileri ile ulaşmanızı bekliyorum..

Katılan herkese çok teşekkür ediyorum..

Çekilişlerimiz devam edecek:)

Sevgiler

About Author

1 Yorum

  1. I have to say that I wasn’t that impressed. I asked it, Do books have authros? , and it couldn’t provide an answer. Now that’s the sort of factual knowledge that a question-answering system should be able to discover on its own, given access to enough webpages. By god, I’m going to write one of these myself on day!All they have to do to make the machine discover that books have authros is to scan a dictionary. Some dictionaries define author as one who writes a book . By itself, that wouldn’t be enough information to tell whether all books have authros ; so, what one could do is to have the system check a long list of books to see whether they have authros and then, if so, it could reach a high level of confidence that all books have authros . The exact same procedure should work to discover that statues have sculptors or creators; planets have orbits; houses have rooms; animals have habitats; etc. etc. This strategy wouldn’t work with a statement like all humans have hands , because some humans are handicapped and have no hands. The way to solve this problem is to sub-divide the category (micro-context) humans into the two sub-categories non-handicapped humans and handicapped humans , and then the claim all (non-handicapped) humans have hands would be a true statement in the former category, while only sometimes being true in the latter.

Leave A Reply